Harvard Law Review, June ’16: Institutional memory in criminal process; statutory interpretation; and international law

The June 2016 issue, Number 8, of the Harvard Law Review features these contents:

• Note, “Chinese Common Law? Guiding Cases and Judicial Reform”

Furthermore, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on sex-discrimination implications of gender-normed FBI fitness requirements; trademark law and the antidisparagement rule as a constitutional problem; practical elimination of the adverse-interest exception as a defense to fraud-on-the-market claims; deference to administrative agency’s amicus brief’s interpretation of student-loan regulations; parties’ analysis of fair use before issuing copyright-violation takedown notice; causation standards for penalty enhancement in Controlled Substances Act cases; and admiralty jurisdiction and removal to federal court after a 2011 amendment to 28 USC § 1441. Finally, the issue includes several brief comments on Recent Publications.

The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible graphics from the original, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting. This is the eighth and final issue of academic year 2015-2016. Quid Pro Books is the ebook publisher of the Review, since 2011, and back issues are found here.

Available in all leading eBook formats: