HARVARD LAW REVIEW‘s June ’17 issue: Dworkin’s reply to Hart, police expertise, and foreign affairs federalism
Furthermore, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on: requiring proof of administrative feasibility to satisfy class action Rule 23; whether prison gerrymandering violates the Equal Protection Clause; justiciability of suit against the government for military sexual assaults; whether criminal procedure requires retroactive application of Hurst v. Florida to pre-Ring cases; whether statutory interpretation’s rule of lenity requires fixing cocaine possession penalties by total drug weight; and, in international law, the UN’s Security Council asserting Israel’s settlement activities to be illegal. Finally, the issue includes several summaries of Recent Publications.
The Harvard Law Review is offered in a quality digital edition, featuring active Contents, linked footnotes, active URLs, legible tables, and proper ebook and Bluebook formatting. The Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. It comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2300 pages per volume. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions. This is the final issue of academic year 2016-2017.
. . .
Available in all leading eBook formats:
Amazon for Kindle.
Barnes & Noble for Nook.
Google for Play, as well as Google Books.
Apple iTunes and iBooks, found direct on the iPad and iPhone (preview).
And in ePUB format at Smashwords; look for it, too, at such eBook sites as Kobobooks for the Kobo Reader, Axis360, and Scribd.
…
Cataloging Volume 130, Number 8:
ISBN: 9781610277792 (ePUB)
ASIN: B0714QMW7P (Kindle)
Page count: 289 pp.; list price: US $3.99
Released and available: May 31, 2017